The Establishment and Development of the Intellectual Property System in China

  Intellectual Property Center, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
    
  1. Traditional Attitudes toward the Results of Intellectual Creations
    
  Although ancient Chinese made many famous inventions, such as papermaking, printing, gunpowder, and compass, there was no intellectual property system in ancient China. The traditional attitudes toward the results of intellectual creations were reflected well by the two following sayings.
    
  The first saying is “to steal a book is not a steal” or “to steal a book is an elegant offence”. This referred to literary works, means that if one stole a book to read, it was not a steal. If we infer a little bit further, not only to steal a book (tangible property) to read was not a steal, but also to steal a work (intangible property) to pirate was not a steal.
    
  The second saying is “to pass an invention or know-how to one’s daughter-in-law but daughter”. In a given society, if there is a patent system, an inventor can apply for a patent and enjoy an exclusive right in a certain period. If there is no patent system, however, the inventor must take some confidential measures to keep the invention as secret. Otherwise, once the invention disclosed, other people would be freely to take use of the invention and the inventor’s interests would be damaged. Because there was no patent system in ancient China, if one passed an invention or know-how to one’s daughter-in-law, the invention or know-how would be kept as secret in one’s family. If one passed an invention or know-how to one’s daughter, the invention or know-how would be disclosed to another family after the daughter married to a man in another family. Therefore, this saying means that there was no respect to other’s invention.
    
  The traditional attitudes toward the results of intellectual creation were based on the traditional economic structure and the related social structure. It must be noticed that these three elements, the traditional attitudes and the related economic and social structures, are the starting points for China to import the intellectual property system that originated from western world. And even in today, if one is going to consider the intellectual property system or the protection of intellectual property rights in China, one must bear in mind the traditional attitudes and the related social and economic structures. In fact, the traditional attitudes toward the results of intellectual creations still have some kind of influence today.
    
  2. The intellectual property system before 1980’s
    
  At the end of Qing Dynasty, China enacted some regulations and laws concerning the protection of intellectual property rights, such as the Regulations on the Reward of Technical Inventions, Copyright Law, and Provisional Regulations on the Registration of Trademark. Those regulations and laws were enacted against the background that China was trying to establish a modern legal system, and most laws in that time were imported from Japan. Because of the quick collapse of the Qing Dynasty and the social and economic situations in that time, however, the regulations and laws were never implemented.
    
  During the period of Republic of China (1911-1949), both Beijing Government and Nanking Government enacted some laws concerning copyright, trademark, and patent. For example, Nanking Government enacted Copyright Law in 1928, Trademark Law in 1930, and Patent Law in 1944. After the enactments of the laws above, it seemed that China had established its intellectual property system. However, those laws were almost in papers. Because of the social and economic situations in that period, especially the political turbulence and the wars in that period, the copyright law and the trademark law only played a very limited role in some municipal areas, and the patent law was not implemented at all.

  After the establishment of People’s Republic of China in 1949, China promulgated several regulations concerning intellectual property rights, such as Provisional Regulation on the Protection of the Rights of Invention and Patent (1950), Resolution on the Improvement and Development of Publishing Works (1950), Provisional Regulations on the Registration of Trademark (1950), and Regulations on the Reward of Invention (1963), and Regulations on the Administration of Trademark (1963).
    
  Under the special political, economic, and social situations after 1949, the regulations above did not reach the goal to promote technology inventions and prosperity of literary and artistic works. In fact, an intellectual property system was not necessary at all for the so called “planning economy”. Under this economic system, any technical invention belonged to the state, and the inventors were encouraged by some limited awards from the state. Under this economic system, the trademark registration was a method to manage the planned economy. In the period of “Culture Revolution”, even those limited laws and regulations were nothing left.
    
  3. The Establishment of the Modern Intellectual Property System
    
  China began to carry out its policy of reform and opening to the outside world in 1978. In order to meet the needs of the reform and opening to the outside world, China started to establish its modern intellectual property system.
    
  In August 1982, China passed its trademark law, which went into effect in March 1983. In March 1984, the patent law was passed and went into effect in April 1985. In September 1990, China passed its copyright law, which went into effect in June 1991. And again in September 1993 the unfair competition law was passed and went into effect in December 1993. In addition to the laws above, China adhered to Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property in 1985, Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works in 1992, Geneva Convention for the Protection of the Producers of Phonograms against Unauthorized Duplication of their Phonograms in 1993, and again TRIPS Agreement in 2001.
    
  In a period of less than 20 years, China enacted the laws concerning with trademark, patent, copyright, trade secret, and unfair competition, and adhered to the primary international conventions in intellectual property rights administered by WIPO and WTO, such as Paris Convention, Berne Convention, and TRIPS Agreement. It is a unique achievement in the world that China has established a modern intellectual property system in such a short period of time.
    
  In fact, China has tremendously enhanced its level of intellectual property protection in recent ten years. This is demonstrated by the two rounds of the legislatures after 1992. While the first round of the legislatures took place under the background that China and the United States disputed on the protection of intellectual property, the second round of the legislatures took place under the background that China made its efforts to become a member of WTO.
    
  In January 1992, China and the Untied States signed their first Memorandum on the protection of intellectual property rights. In this memorandum, China promised to amend its patent law, to provide protection to trade secret, and to adhere to Bern Convention and Geneva Convention. In light of the memorandum, China amended its patent law in 1992, expanded the protection to chemical products, prolonged the patent term to 20 years, and provided the patentee a new right to control the import of the patented invention. In 1993, China enacted its Unfair Competition Law, which provides the protection of trade secret and prohibits some other unfair competition practices. Although China did not amend its copyright law this time, it adhered to Berne Convention in 1992 and Geneva Convention in 1993, and thereof greatly enhanced the level of copyright protection.
    
  Since 1986 China had made its efforts to become a member of GATT. After the conclusion of Uruguay round negotiation of GATT and the establishment of Word Trade Organization in 1995, China made its efforts in turn to become a member of WTO. In order to adhere to WTO, China must amend its related laws in accordance with the agreements of WTO. Under this background, the intellectual property laws, such as patent law, copyright law, and trademark law, must be amended in light of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS agreement).
    
  In August 2000, China amended its patent law. In October 2001, China amended its copyright law and trademark law. In addition to these amendments, China promulgated the Regulation on the Protection of New Plant Varieties in March 1997, and the Regulation on the Protection of the Layout of Integrated Circuits in 2001. With these legislatures and the legislatures before, China fulfilled its obligation under TRIPS Agreement and established a new and advanced intellectual property system, which followed the principles, standards, and basic requirements set by TRIPS Agreement, Paris Convention, and Berne Convention.
    
  4. The gap between the legal system and the social reality
    
  Now two issues have been touched in this paper. On the one hand, the traditional attitudes toward the results of intellectual creations are discussed, such as “to steal a book is not a steal”, “to pass an invention or know-how to one’s daughter-in-law but daughter”. On the other hand, China imported intellectual property system in 20th century and established a new and advance intellectual property system at the beginning of this century that followed the international principles, standards, and basic requirements. So what is the relationship between these two issues? Is the new and advanced system implemented well in China?
    
  It is apparent that the intellectual property system is neither rooted in the traditional economic and social structures, nor rooted in the traditional ideology. In some extent, this system is alien to the traditional ideology and the related economic and social structures. Therefore, how this system is going to operate and what a role this system is going to play, are totally dependent on the current social and economic situations in China, and dependent on the current ideology of intellectual property rights in China.
    
  Since 1980, because of the carrying out of the policy of reform and opening to the outside world, the social and economic situations in China have changed fundamentally. Many new social and economic entities have emerged, personnel and financial management have been changed greatly, many municipal cities have been highly industrialized, and a lot of new industrialized cities have been established. Under this background, traditional agricultural economy has been disappearing, the traditional social structure has changed tremendously, the awareness of personal rights is greatly enhanced, and the attitudes toward the results of intellectual creations are greatly changed. It seems that the imported intellectual property system has taken a root in the new social and economic situations, and the new ideology of intellectual property rights has taken its shape.
    
  In addition to the social and economic changes, the political system has changed as well and contributed a great deal to the implementation of the intellectual property system. In the executive level, China has established Trademark Office, Copyright Office, Patent Office, and State Intellectual Property Office. These offices are in charge of different administrative affairs concerning trademark, copyright, patent, and have played an important role to promote the protection of intellectual property in China. In the judicial level, China established special trial courts of intellectual property in Supreme Court, provincial High Courts, some Intermediate Courts, and the courts in big municipal cities. Most of the judges in those special trail courts are experts in intellectual property law, having studied intellectual property law in western countries, such as the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Japan. Up to now, they have decided many cases and protected the interests of many owners of copyright, patent, trade secret, and trademark.
    
  Thanks to the efforts made by the legislative, executive, and judicial systems, China has established a good framework to protect the intellectual property rights, and created a good environment for the foreign investment. And this framework has encouraged technology inventions, promoted cultural prosperity, and regulated market economy. According to State Intellectual Property Office, the patent applications accumulated to 1 million in 2000, and reached 2 million in 2004. According to the Trademark Office, trademark applications in resent years are about 200 thousand every year, reflecting the prosperity and development of industry and commerce. It is apparent that the intellectual property system in China has played an important role, and has been implemented to a certain degree.
    
  On the other hand, however, there are still many problems in the protection of intellectual property in China. For example, piracy, patent infringement, passing off, and unfair competition do exist and disturb the economic and social orders. Sometimes the infringement activities are so serious and the government agencies have to take actions to curb the serious piracy and passing off. It seems that some people have no awareness to respect other’s intellectual property rights. It is under this kind of situations that many foreign and domestic enterprises are complaining that their intellectual property rights are not protected well.
    
  Actually, only after the enactment of the trademark law, patent law, copyright law, and unfair competition law, the enforcement became a big problem in China. In this respect, China and the United States disputed again in 1995 and 1996, and signed their second and third memorandums on the protection of intellectual property rights, especially on the enforcement of the laws. After China amended its intellectual property law in accordance with TRIPS agreement and became a member of WTO, both foreign and domestic right owners are still concerned to the enforcement. If the new and advanced intellectual property system and the related rights can not be enforced, the system and the rights would be meaningless.
    
  Therefore, while China has established an advanced intellectual property system, there still exits a big gap between the legal system and the social and economic reality. This is well demonstrated by the problems such as the enforcement of the intellectual property laws, and the weak awareness of intellectual property rights. If China is going to implement the legal system well, there are still a lot of works to be done.
    
  5. Conclusion
    
  To establish and enforce an intellectual property system in a given society, the key elements are the economic and social structures, and the related ideology of intellectual property rights. Although China tried to establish its intellectual property at the end of Qing Dynasty, in the period of Republic of China, and in the period between 1950 and 1980, the intellectual property laws and regulations in those three periods were almost in papers and not implemented. The reason is that before 1980’s, the basic economic structure and social structure in China, and the related attitudes toward the results of intellectual creations, only changed a little bit, or even did not change at all. Thus, the imported intellectual property system did not take a root in the society, or only played a limited role in some limited areas.
    
  Since 1980, in order to meet the needs of reform and opening to the outside world, China has made great efforts again to establish its intellectual property system. In the meanwhile, the basic social and economic structures in China have changed fundamentally, new social and economic entities emerged, new political and legal systems were erected, and right awareness strengthened. It is under this background that the imported intellectual property system has been rooted in the social and economic life, and the traditional attitudes toward the results of intellectual creations have changed fundamentally.
    
  Although there is still a big gap between the imported intellectual property system and the social and economic reality, although there are many problems in the protection of intellectual property rights here and there, the basic framework for the protection of intellectual property rights has been erected, and the basic social and economic picture has changed. Under these situations, more and more people are honoring other’s intellectual property rights, more and more right owners are vigorously enforcing their rights. Therefore, the problems related can be resolved in this framework, and the gap between the intellectual property system and the economic and social realty will be reduced gradually and eliminated finally.
    
  Now China is developing and improving its new social and economic systems. It is no doubt that these new social and economic systems are contributing to the implement of the new and advanced intellectual property system, and in turn the intellectual property system is contributing to the development of the new social and economic systems in China. Thus the imported intellectual property system shall be rooted more and more hardly in China and play a more and more important role in the society.(Li,mingde)

From: http://int.ipr.gov.cn/ipr/inter/info/Article.jsp?a_no=185348&col_no=1108&dir=200803

知识产权,何时能换个滋味品尝?

中新网4月29日电 在中国经济跃进的铿锵旋律之中,知识产权带给中国企业的伤痛显得有些不太和谐,尽管中国企业自主创新的脚步一直没有停止。在中国知识产权战略已稳步推进的大环境下,发觉知识产权体系建设缺失的中国企业应该虚心向爱普生、IBM等国际领先企业学习,扎扎实实建设知识产权体系,化苦涩为甘甜。

  炙手可热:中国经济新焦点

  毋庸置疑,知识产权正在成为中国战略、中国经济的新焦点。

  4月7日,《中华人民共和国政府和新西兰政府自由贸易协定》在北京正式签署。尤为引人瞩目的是,双方将致力于建立和加强中国国家知识产权局(SIPO)及其他相关机构与新西兰知识产权局(IPONZ)之间的合作。《协定》明确,双方认识到知识产权在促进经济与社会发展,特别是在新数字经济、技术创新和贸易方面的重要性。各方应建立和维持透明的知识产权体制与体系,并重申《TRIPS协定》及双方参加的与知识产权有关的其他多边协定的承诺。

  而在此前的3月29日,国务院已正式印发了《国务院2008年工作要点》。该《工作要点》共包括10面57点,其中第十七项要点即是实施国家知识产权战略,并明确了该工作要点由国家知识产权局牵头。国务院在工作要点中指出,要进一步加强专利法律法规体系建设,深入开展知识产权宏观管理工作,推进知识产权信息化和条件保障建设,提高专利审查综合能力,加强知识产权人才队伍建设,进一步推进知识产权国际合作与交流。

  与国家在宏观政策层面的强势推动相映成趣,中国企业对知识产权体系建设的内在需求也有猛然觉醒和强烈启动之势。由国家知识产权局举办的各类知识讲座,很受企业界欢迎。而具有务实意义的国际交流,也正在有序展开。在2007年,作为全球知识产权体系建设的标杆企业,爱普生以开放的胸怀,数次向中国业界毫无保留地交流其在知识产权战略布局上的丰富经验。在有关知识产权的论坛峰会上,精工爱普生株式会社业务执行董事、知识产权本部长上柳雅誉先生,几乎成为最受欢迎的演讲嘉宾。爱普生中国区相关人士表示,2008年仍会投入资源,为促进中国企业建立知识产权体系做出自己应有的贡献。

  冰冷事实:不能承受之苦

  知识产权在中国的热度及进展令人欣喜,这是中国经济进一步提升其内在竞争力的关键。但冷观现实,我们却可以无奈地发现,知识产权并没有成为中国企业普遍意义的提升砝码。相反,它带给很多中国企业的是不能承受之苦。

  事实上,涉外知识产权“战书”的纷至沓来,已经在近几年演变成惊人的趋势。资料显示,在我国加入WTO之前,四川省法院受理的涉及大陆以外知识产权纠纷案件总共只有2件。但从入世到2004年年底,案件就飙升至31件。窥一斑而见全豹,说中国企业近年陷入知识产权泥潭已不是夸张之语。让人痛心的是,在众多的知识产权纷争中,中国企业品尝了苦果。更令人痛心的是,不少企业甚至是“吃一堑不长一智”。在德国著名的 CeBIT展会上,中国企业两度被警方查封,可谓是最典型的案例。

  在2007年的CeBIT电子展上,德国海关工作人员就曾对华旗、纽曼等中国参展厂商进行了搜查。经证实,先后共有12家公司的展台被搜查,上百款产品被德国海关查扣。锥心之痛尚未平复,在2008年的CeBIT电子展上,竟然又有中国企业领受同样的苦涩。汉诺威警方说,展会开幕之前,警方就已获得了大量有关参展商侵犯专利权的投诉。被搜查的厂商产品均是涉嫌侵犯了Sisvel所代理的音频压缩技术。而在被搜查的51家厂商中,中国厂商高达39家!

  换种滋味:何时苦尽甘来

  中国社科院知识产权研究中心副主任李明德研究员认为,从总体上看,我国知识产权存在两个不适应:一方面我国知识产权工作总体状况与国家经济、科技和社会的发展要求不相适应,另一方面知识产权工作总体状况与面临的国际新形势的发展要求不相适应。这双重的不适应,更显出问题的严峻性。市场竞争绝不温情,留给中国企业疗伤的时间并不多。中国企业的跨越,已是迫在眉睫。

  “知识产权体系建设是一项知难而进、长期构筑并且要求细节完美的系统工程,需要扎扎实实地做工作”,精工爱普生株式会社业务执行董事、知识产权本部长上柳雅誉先生指出:“企业需要打造一种深入骨髓的DNA”。据上柳雅誉介绍,爱普生打造的是“创造与挑战”的企业文化。追求独创性,致力于开发和培育唯我独有的强势技术,实现从无到有的创新,创造出他人不可效仿的全新产品。

  反思,很多中国企业之所以在知识产权上屡屡受挫,恰恰正是这种文化的贫乏。深圳一家手机厂商的老总直言不讳:“研发成本过高,并且短期内很难见成效,在电子产品利润日趋微薄的今天,根本支付不起高额的研发费用。”更有甚者,明知侵权,但为了一时的利益,也敢铤而走险。随着法制的完善,此类行为终会将企业推上不归之路。

  即便是那些有诚意建设知识产权体系的企业,也鲜见它们从战略的高度去进行布局。观察一下国内企业,我们可以发现,大多数负责知识产权的,通常是错位的其他部门兼管。反观爱普生,其知识产权本部专业人士高达近400人。更令人震惊的是,爱普生的专利信息检索系统,收录了近2000万件专利,在检索日美两国专利的性能上,远远高于日本特许厅提供的公开系统的能力。如此巨大的差距,让我们汗颜之余,更应令我们警醒,知耻而后勇是唯一的选择。

  事实上,中国企业在知识产权体系建设上正迎来大好契机。随着国家政策的支持,竞争环境的倒逼,爱普生等标杆企业的帮助,专业人才的日益丰富,中国企业跨越障碍、远离困局、拥抱知识产权带来的实力提升,已只是时间的问题。但什么时间苦尽甘来,不仅要看中国企业的雄心壮志,更要看背后的付出和行动。

来源:http://www.chinanews.com.cn/it/kong/news/2008/04-29/1234508.shtml